On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager
run a script to
>> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>> >>
>> >> -Thanks.
>> >> --
>> >> devel mailing list
>> >> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> >>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>> >
>> >
>> > With mono-2.x not able to build in Fedora 22, and zero mono-based
>> > applications on the critical path (that is, none are required for any
>> > given
>> > spin), could mono 4 be pushed out to F22 in updates along with working
>> > builds of all the mono-dependent packages? I'd rather not see Fedora
22
>> > be
>> > without any mono support for the entirety of its life cycle...
>>
>> No, there's a lot of packages with mono bindings that are on the
>> critical path, avahi for example, this is WAY to invasive for F-22.
>>
>> Peter
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
>
> But the bindings themselves aren't used in the critical path. We don't
even
They're not used but they're built against the version of mono in Fedora
> bundle mono into any spin anymore. We couldn't even if we wanted to
because
> mono-2.x isn't building in F22. If these Timotheus and others can pull
> together the fixes needed to get all the packages up and going again,
could
> it not be pushed as a post-F22 release update?
No, it's extremely unlikely, we generally don't rebase entire dev
stacks post release for good reason, it's very invasive
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
So we won't have mono stuff working for F22 then?
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!