On 4/16/20 5:43 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 07:41:07AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
Really, it may be best to go about this in the same way as Ubuntu, with nss- dns instead of nss-resolve.. Editing /etc/resolv.conf is still commonly done on Fedora, especially on servers. In fact, I never knew that NetworkManager would clobber that until this thread. If this isn't mean to wreck everyone's systems, backwards compatibility is key.
Relying on nss_dns causes bugs like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1624320 (systemd-resolved appends 127.0.0.53 to resolv.conf alongside existing entries). It still gets (angry) comments, years after it was filled.
It is not nss_dns use, which makes angry comments from people. It should not be pushed into nameservers list when its broken. It should be possible to use resolved just for mdns and llmnr and leave dns for proper servers. If it were opt-in and not opt-out, no annoyed comments would be required.