On 06/23/2011 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.06.2011 14:10, schrieb Steve Clark:
> On 06/23/2011 03:29 AM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
>> Steve Clark<sclark(a)netwolves.com> writes:
>>
>>> If your are concerned with boot times suspend to disk!
>> Suspend to disk is dead slow even with an SSD. That really is no
>> alternative.
>>
>> Suspend to RAM is nice when it works which is about 4 times out of 5 on
>> this laptop. (A great improvement over a few years ago, by the way).
>>
>>
>> /Benny
> Suspend to disk on my 2gb 5 year old laptop takes about 15 seconds.
> I don't think that is slow
and you think while booting the system needs to read 2 GB from disk as after
suspend? try this with moden hardware with 8 or 16 GB RAM:-)
Hi Reindl,
I don't think you understand me. I think that justification for using systemd because
it lead to faster boot ups
is not a valid justification.
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Sr. Software Engineer III
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark(a)netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com