2009/4/27 Arthur Pemberton <pemboa(a)gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar
<naheemzaffar(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> When Fedora has defaults, to me it means that someone has put some
thought
> into this, into making it all coherent. And that is a good thing. If I
> disagree with any default, I can then try to work around it, but that
would
> only be a 1% change decision in most cases instead of forcing the end
user
> to choose 100% of the components.
What's the criteria being used to decide the default desktop?
The people who work on it, develop it choosing choosing the defaults as so.
If I did not trust them on their decisions, I would not be using their
products (as much?).
(Trust as opposed to agree as I can disagree and change the
settings/programs.)