On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, at 5:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 09:00:40AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> Two things:
>
> - This proposal is explicitly trying to tie everything together. I think without the
"bigger picture", it's actually *more* confusing. For example, just pushing
the container images does little unless we invest in them as a derivation source and build
tooling and docs around them.
> - At a very practical level, I find context switching in Mediawiki syntax to be
rather tedious. I'd prefer to discuss the individual sections in the already extant
tracker issues that accept Markdown and have a well-understood and used discussion
mechanism. (Or of course, email here)
>
> But you're certainly not wrong, it *is* a big proposal. Happy to make changes,
I'm mainly just saying there already are dedicated sub-proposal trackers to discuss
the details of those.
Would it make sense to have a Fedora Objective (at the Council level) around
this?
Probably?
I would say actually that this proposal is not even the end. I cut out a part due to
objections/concerns, but I personally (still) want to get rid of e.g. the
Silverblue/Kinoite/CoreOS type "sub-brands". It's just e.g.
"Workstation, but in image+container-default mode" - where it even matters.
Otherwise one can just say "I run Fedora". This is revisiting
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/its-more-fedora-than-it-is-fedora-... in
effect - I personally think "we'll actually just do what you asked for when you
type dnf -y install cowsay" is a notable leap here.