On 02/04/2014 12:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:57:51AM +0000, "Jóhann B.
>> For that matter, there could be a "Fedora GNOME" spin distinct from
>> Fedora Workstation product, if there were people really keen to work on it,
>> perhap as a showcase of upstream technology without worrying about the
>> concerns of the Fedora Workstation WG's particular area of focus. (With
>> "people keen to work on it" as the really key phrase.)
> But you cannot overlap products as in you cannot have a "Gnome
> workstation and "KDE workstation" etc you cannot have an
> product outside what is already defined in the ServerWG nor a
> "Cloud" product outside what is already defined there.
I think it's okay for there to be some overlap. The real world doesn't
always chop up into neat boxes. If there's a *lot* of overlap between two
nominally-different products, then that is less useful and it's probably
better for them to either work together or else find a stronger
But that's talking about products. As long as someone is interested in doing
them, spins can overlap like crazy.
Yes but community products wont be considered "primary" products which
means if things continues in the same manner as "default" does be
ignored by QA/Releng/Marketing/Design since the focus will *only* be on