On 20 February 2018 at 13:11, Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobrain(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
[..]
today I've split⁰ librpmsign from rpm-build-libs into its own
subpackage rpm-
sign-libs.
[root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs
error: Failed dependencies:
librpmbuild.so.8()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
python3-rpm-4.14.1-6.fc28.1.x86_64
librpmsign.so.8()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
python3-rpm-4.14.1-6.fc28.1.x86_64
[root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs python3-rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
python3-rpm >= 4.13.0-0.rc1.29 is needed by (installed)
python3-dnf-2.7.5-8.fc28.noarch
[root@tin ~]# rpm -e rpm-build-libs python3-rpm python3-dnf
error: Failed dependencies:
python3-dnf >= 2.7.0 is needed by (installed)
python3-dnf-plugins-core-2.1.5-4.fc28.noarch
python3-dnf < 3.0 is needed by (installed)
python3-dnf-plugins-core-2.1.5-4.fc28.noarch
python3-dnf = 2.7.5-8.fc28 is needed by (installed) dnf-2.7.5-8.fc28.noarch
I'm only pointing to the fact that now package which name suggests
that it has something to do with the building packages is required by
@Core
On top above now both (rpm-build-libs and rpm-sign-libs) still are
required by the minimal set of packages.
In other words, this and prev change introduces negative simplification factor.
Maybe it would be good to review the content of the python3-rpm .. *maybe*.
kloczek
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn:
http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH