On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:06:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I really would like all my desktop applications to run in a
sandbox, whether
> they come from upstream directly or from us.
I would like that too, to be clear. That is why I used the term
"upstream distribution" and not the term "sandboxed apps". Sandboxing
is
a desirable technology for both upstream and centralized distribution,
which makes its conflation with upstream distribution unfortunate in
this debate: I think that has come about because sandboxing is arguably
more _urgently_ desirable for upstream distribution, but what we're
really arguing about here is the old 'upstream vs. distro-based'
chestnut, not sandboxing.
In that case, I absolutely agree with your previous statement which has
been snipped from this subthread. :)
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>