On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 07:42:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Michael Schwendt
<mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:32:33 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> rpms/gqview
>
> Really?!
Congratulations, you have just explained why absentee maintainers are
bad and why we orphan things.
> It is unmaintained for over 10 years.
>
> It has been forked into Geeqie (package "geeqie") roughly 10 years
> ago, and Geeqie at least has seen several releases since then.
Perhaps just take gqview and retire it then?
Shouldn't it be retired automatically when no one takes it?
--
Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection,
xmpp: zdzichubg(a)chrome.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia