Dne 03. 07. 23 v 16:13 Leon Fauster via devel napsal(a):
Am 03.07.23 um 00:41 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 2 2023 at 08:33:46 AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez
> <carlosrodrifernandez(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> We have been told repeatedly that "the source is there" in CentOS
>> stream.
>
> The source for the next minor version is there.
>
>> I can see the scenario that RH branches from CentOS stream to
>> create a new minor release, and during QA, a bug is discovered and a
>> patch is backported (or created) to fix it internally in your minor
>> release branch. However, if that bug wants to be addressed also in the
>> next minor release, it will need to appear in the CentOS stream at some
>> point, whether via a patch or an entire source version bump.
>
> Right; nobody wants regressions. In this particular example, the fix
> is there via "an entire source version bump."
>
>> If that's not the case, then RH is having some long living parallel git
>> repo which will eventually create ABI compatibility issues, and it is
>> also not what we have been told.
>
> So I'm really primarily here to talk about Fedora and CentOS Stream,
> because we often can't talk very much about RHEL. I'm going to point
> you to this page:
>
>
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
>
> And in particular this graphic:
>
>
https://access.redhat.com/sites/default/files/images/337_rhel_9_life_cycl...
>
With the transitioning to "maintenance phase" next summer (EL8), I
assume that for the next 5 years nothing gets pushed into c8s git
anymore??