On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 17:15 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
seth vidal (skvidal(a)phy.duke.edu) said:
> I think continuing the migration of misc items to extras and making core
> truly core is good.
>
> I'd be willing to work toward:
> - extras organization into package groups or even sub-repos
Including extending this to CD grouping? (I should write up
the strawman proposal for this.)
Yah - I think it should. Although I tell you what I'd like - I think
making it easy for users to make their own 'extras' cds that include the
stuff they want + deps would make the most sense.
you tell a program a list of packages you want and it compiles a list of
that package + all its deps from extras and puts them in cd-sized
subdirs.
that would take some sorting work but it's not outside the realm of
possibility.
-sv