On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:35:00PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Another alternate here is that we could make taskotron a
'namespace'
like currently rpms/ and docker/ are. Then we would have
perhaps: /taskotron/rpms/foobar/ as the top level and all the rest is
the same. This would get us a seperate pkgdb entry for the taskotron
part of things (ie, it could have different maintainers, people allowed
to commit, etc). That would add to complexity however.
How much complexity in terms of ongoing maintenance? I think having
different committers is a big plus. The big downside — other than
complexity — is that the in-package-dist-git approach is very obvious
to existing packagers, whereas the namespaces are still a sort of
easter egg. Maybe we could do something in fedpkg to make it more
discoverable?
Also, if we do go with a separate namespace, how about "tests" instead
of "taskotron", with tasktron a subdir of that, and "testcases"
another (for
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/942)?
Thanks for working on all this. It's awesome to see it start to
come to
fruition!
+1
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader