On 02/08/2010 02:22 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic:
> I
> placed the list of found bugs to the Fedora wiki [2]. IMHO only bugs
> with 2 comments should be closed, because 2 comments mean that the
> package maintainer did not touch the bug (ABRT adds 2 comments to every
> bug it creates). We can close 129 bugs this way.
This means that the active maintainers, who responded to their reports
and asked for more info will have no benefit from the script and the
ones who ignored the abrt reports did right. Isn't it ironic?
Yes, that is
unfortunate. However, it is not polite to close a bug in
the middle of some discussion. I can go through the remaining 80 bugs
and close some of them manually.
>> [1]
https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/browser/src/Backtrace/abrt-bz-dupchecker
> Its 551 bugs that can be closed as duplicates, not 900. I placed the
> list of affected bugs to the Fedora wiki [3].
IMO all lists should be sorted by package owner. I own ~ 120 packages
and it is a quite lot of work to search all these packages in your
lists.
I'll try to do it.
Karel