On 06/27/2014 07:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200
drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast
but
> bandwith capped vs. not.
>
> If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to
> find out why there are slow and fix that. One thing for instance is
> that it insists on generating the original rpm while creating an
> uncompressed rpm would save a compress + uncompressed cycle during
> updates (the former is a bit extensive for xz).
I think It could avoid doing that if people didn't mind that it couldn't
be gpg checked.
The signature is on the RPM header, not the payload. The RPM header
only lists digests of individual files (after decompression).
So this shouldn't make a difference.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security