On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:02:48PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:54 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> Yep, that happens. There are also people that add +0 comments to
> updates saying "Untested". There is an obvious need for more
> fine-grained karma types.
I've sent out notes to the test list to ask people not to do either of
those things in future, I think the occurrence of them has gone down
significantly since those emails went out. (I also updated the proven
tester instructions page).
More fine-grained karma is still coming in Bodhi 2.0, right? My
understanding was that we'd already agreed on the framework for it (in
those threads on this list a few months back) and we were just waiting
for the implementation now.
Yes, that's the plan.
I finally got the Bodhi v2.0 plans/ideas/status out of my brain and on to the wiki:
I linked to a couple of pages regarding karma improvements, but please
update it with any more recent discussions regarding this change if you
know of any. Also, more QA feature ideas are welcome.