On Jan 13, 2008 6:13 PM, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 13/01/2008, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I would expect different services to also cause some performance
> penalties. I doubt OpenSUSE uses SElinux for one. This is a selling
> point for Fedora.
>
This thread makes for interesting reading on the overhead of SElinux:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14
Even with that patch, SElinux seems to incur a 25% overhead on simple
file open/close. Not sure if that's since been adressed, or if I am
misinterpretting the data given.
This is about a patch that fixes this issue and the patch is already merged.