Hi Michael
I'm not sure of what packaging mistakes you are talking.
I just updated the spec file and removed the requires field.
But yes, I'd like to give it for review now.
Bests,
Joël
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 21:57:07 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Just modified the gsequencer.spec file. Now, it should be more the fedora way.
>>
>>
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ags/files/fedora/
>>
>> Additionally, I uploaded the srpm and rpm packages built.
>>
>> * gsequencer
>> * gsequencer-devel
>> * gsequencer-devel-docs
>> * gsequencer-debuginfo
>
> So, do you want to offer it for official package review or not?
> It still contains a lot of packaging mistakes _not_ specific to Fedora.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org