On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
>
What makes you think that no community input is considered?
Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
From whom it was gathered?
What was the question?
What was the answer?
- Gilboa