On 10/24/2016 06:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 18:07 +0200, Jakub Filak wrote:
> I use ABRT to report crashes, I deal with ABRT reports and I'm happy
> with
> the current default.
>
> I am sorry. I understand your problem, but I don't have any good
> solution
> for it.
>
> Could you please propose a better default?
The easiest solution would just be to remove "key" from the list of
sensitive phrases, I bet that would cut the false positive rate by a
huge amount.
OK. I'd like to see some examples of the backtrace with hash tables before I
update the list of sensitive words. Perhaps we think up a better solution.
Jakub