Re: NEEDINFO denial of service attack
This issue was caused by me as part of post-F26 EOL housekeeping,
following the https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736#comment-455818 FESCo
decision. If this approach is causing issues we can skip the step
setting "needinfo" flag and leave just a comment in the bug.
I am sorry for any inconvenience this might caused.
Jan
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1736
>
> I've had about 100 bugs set to NEEDINFO of me to check if some obscure
> Fedora package is vulnerable to some 1 or 2 year old bug.
>
> Is this a useful use of anyone's time?
it is hard to tell without examples. Are the packages properly
maintained and up to date? Are the obscure packages your packages? If
not, by were you the target of the NEEDINFO?
Kind regards
Till
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
--
Jan Kuřík
JBoss EAP Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic