On 2023-01-19 00:55, Lennart Poettering wrote:
hat you could do is split up the problem: have iscsi-starter.service
or so, that is separate from the iscsi.service main service.
If I'm not mistaken, this approach would also probably need approval by
FESCo, since it'd involve reverting the "default on" status of the iscsi
service. Is that right?