On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 04:12:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 16:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 22:38 +0000, till(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > os-autoinst adamwill 73 weeks ago
>
> Uh. What? I built this for fc26 in April. That's not 73 weeks ago. And
> 'dnf install os-autoinst' does not report any broken dependencies.
>
>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=878719
>
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2a2d78207d
Oh, I see the problem now, though it doesn't explain the '73 weeks
ago':
[os-autoinst]
os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.4-18.20170410git97928a2.fc26.armv7hl requires
openvswitch
[os-autoinst]
os-autoinst-openvswitch-4.4-18.20170410git97928a2.fc26.ppc64 requires openvswitch
Where did you find this information? I tried to find out what is
wrong with efl, and it install just fine on F26 here, and it was part
of an update that went to stable 3 days ago.
Zbyszek
> so the problem is that the current stable openvswitch was not built for
> two arches; the openvswitch package currently in updates-testing *is*
> built for those arches, however. It seems pointless to send out an
> update that disables the subpackage for two arches for a few days until
> openvswitch is pushed stable.
>
> Perhaps the proliferation of arches in primary Koji might cause a
> rethink of how this automatic retirement works? It wouldn't seem to be
> a good idea to automatically retire this package (which is in fact
> quite important, and under active maintenance) on this basis.
> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
>
http://www.happyassassin.net
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org