On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:11:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:05:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> In this case however I don't think much productive came from this
> discussion we had about hfsplus-tools. Obviously no one wants
> hfsplus-tools and/or clang enough on Fedora/ARM that they are prepared
> to fix it. So I think we should just drop it on ARM, and let anyone
> who wants it, fix it later (or reenable %{arm} if clang gets fixed).
If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with x86,
then we should just drop them back to secondary status.
That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
discussion. I apologise.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org