On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34:47AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.3.2015 v 22:17 Neil Horman napsal(a):
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>>>> There are currently no flags set at all.
>>>> Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
>>> Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at least I know how
>>> to get rid of it, although I think it should clear out all requests
>>> for closed bugs.
>> This in practice isn't a safe assumption. People do legitimately
>> discuss closed bugs, including requesting and providing information.
>> "Closed" does not always imply "no further discussion is needed
or
>> desired".
> I would assert the opposite to be true. That is to say a state of
"closed" by
> definition implies that a bug no longer needs discussion or consideration. In
> the converse, a bug that is still receiving updates in the form of comments,
> likely should not be in the state "closed".
Is "Thank you" comment allowed after the bug is closed?
Sure I don't see why not. This in my mind is more about the flags.
Neil
Vít
>
> Neil
>
>> --
>> Adam Williamson
>> Fedora QA Community Monkey
>> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
>>
http://www.happyassassin.net
>>
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct