Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 13:45 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot writes:
> Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:07 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> > Nicolas Mailhot writes:
> > >
> > > the consensus seems to be it's more efficient to wait for the
> > > actual Java 7 SUN GPL release than make gcj feature-complete enough
> > > for JBoss.
> >
> > Really? The consensus among whom? I wonder what that's based on.
>
> The consensus as expressed by the Fedora Java team on this list in the
> past
I doubt it. I could only find one posting with the Google query
site://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/ jboss gcj
and that was from one "Nicolas Mailhot".
Then it was on one of the other Linux & Java technical lists
(fedora-maintainers, fedora-extras, fedora-devel-java,
jpackage-discuss(a)zarb.org). Java team members participate in many
different public forums, and I won't pretend I track each of their
messages.
If you deem gcj ready for JBoss feel free to submit a set of JBoss
packages. I certainly won't stop you. You can take the jpackage rpms as
starting point (though now JBoss is Red Hat the submission should
probably come from the JBoss division itself)
--
Nicolas Mailhot