On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:33 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:24 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:18 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > Of course, the correct way to have scriptlets that don't fail is to
> > write them in a way that doesn't fails, not the swipe the failure under
> > the carpet...
>
> Yes, but fixing every possible application which could ever be put in a
> scriplet to never, ever, ever fail, even in the cases when failure is
> acceptable (and shouldn't kill the transaction) is a little beyond the
> mandate of the FPC. ;)
>
If scriptlet are not allowed to ever, ever, fail, then just make rpm
ignore the exit code of scriptlets.
Again, code changes are outside of the FPC mandate. Feel like patching
rpm? :)
~spot