2009/1/28 Brian Pepple :
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 00:40 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 28.01.2009, 14:48 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating:
>> > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:35 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>> > > Some examples:
>> > > * Recently I updated some of the Xfce 4.6 packages. One of them
>> > > was approved without _any_ docs.
>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477732
>> also all the desktop files were installed and listed in %files twice and
>> if the reviewer had tested the package he would have noticed that. Site
>> note: The reviewer has been made a sponsor 2 weeks later.
>
> He was approved as a provenpackager, not as a sponsor.
>
I really don't want to point fingers on anyone, but how can someone
who completed only 3 reviews (one of them is what you are talking
about above) become a provenpackager?
Because the whole proven packager model is broken. :(
Therefor I strongly support Robert Scheck's latest proposal.
IMHO there is clearly a chain of
people-not-doing-their-job-properly on this.