On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:16:46 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:02, Casey Dahlin
<cdahlin(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:05:08PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
>>
>> I think it fails on #1:
>>
>> > Makes it easy for users to focus on their current task and
>> > reduces distraction and interruption
>>
>> First, this point assumes that there is *one* current task. That
>> is not how I work. I have one main task, and I keep an eye on some
>> other things, like whose is in some chats, what comes up in
>> twitter flows, etc.
>>
>
> One could rephrase your complaint as "I don't want to focus on my
> current task." So GNOME shell just isn't for you.
Cold. Can we just call this conversation closed before it gets any
colder?
Gnome Shell is not for various people for various reasons. For those
people there are other desktop environments. The End.
So I make a point. Someone follows that up in a style that is not
preferred by many people.
The consequence is that my point should not be adressed ? We all have
to be quiet about it?
My main point is that the full-screen menu causes a serious
interruption of work flow, and that this in contradiction with the
first point of GnomeShell's list of goals.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.stramm(a)gmail.com