Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung(a)0pointer.de> said:
Given the overlap of the Fedora/RH boot loader folks and the shim
folks, I think there's definitely an avenue to get systemd-boot signed
as payload for SHIM, as alternative to Grub. If Fedora wants this, and
has the man power for it, it should be a quite a reachable goal, given
that sd-boot has only a tiny fraction of the code footprint that Grub has.
So, I went to look a little more at systemd-boot/sd-boot... and noticed
the packaging is really odd in Fedora. Why is it shoved into the
systemd-udev RPM? It seems that systemd-boot should be its own
subpackage.
--
Chris Adams <linux(a)cmadams.net>