On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
> Bodhi also allows you to edit the stable karma value and unless it is
> implemented differently (or has changed again), you can just use a
> stable karma value of 1 and ask someone except the update submitter to
> provide the +1 karma and the update can be pushed to stable. This is
> imho reasonable even after only a one line change to a build.
You still need to get somebody to +1 the update, and more if people -1ed it
This is *really* not an onerous requirement. It simply means 'have one
other person - any other person in the world with a FAS account - run
your code and make sure it actually works before you release it'. If you
don't think that's a good idea, well, I'm not sure what to say.
in the past due to regressions which are already fixed in the current
edited
version. (Yes, update groups will be edited instead of obsoleted if we
Please stop mixing minor bugs in the process in with high-flown rhetoric
about the bureaucratic Board and whatever. This is simply a bug (or,
possibly, an incomplete design; whatever you want to call it), in Bodhi.
I think it's even already been reported and is planned to be addressed
in future Bodhi. Luke?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net