On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Simo Sorce <simo(a)redhat.com> writes:
> [...] B) I will *not* trust an update system that cuts me out of my
> remote server and make me *hope* it will come up later. If yum
> freaks out for *whatever* reason I want to be there with an
> emergency shell open [...] I've been saved more than once by a
> shell open during changes in the configuration or upgrades, that is
> non-negotiable to me. [...]
I agree that this capability is very important.
Nobody has suggested removing it. It'll continue to work as well (or as
badly, if you prefer) as it currently does.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org