On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 02:01 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Firstly, it may occur if it is agreed to be very unlikely that the bug
> can possibly be fixed within a reasonable time frame for the release to
> be made. For instance, fixing the bug may be a task of such technical
> complexity that it cannot possibly be achieved for several weeks or
> months, and it may be held that such a delay would be too disruptive to
> Fedora's development to be justified.
"cannot possibly" — that's pretty strong words. I sure almost anything
could be achieved in several months, if enough people banded up to do it.
So I'd just keep the first sentence, without "possibly", and drop the
rest of the paragraph. That'd cut down on the wordiness too.
Good point, thanks.
> It is expected that in almost 'exceptional' cases, the
bug will be
> accepted as a blocker either for the very next milestone release, or
> for the equivalent milestone for the next release (e.g. if this
> 'exceptional' provision is agreed to apply to a bug that otherwise
> would have blocked {{FedoraVersion|long|next}} Final, it should be
> accepted as a blocker either for {{FedoraVersion|long|next2}} Alpha or
> {{FedoraVersion|long|next2}} Final).
"almost" seems misplaced, or maybe you meant "almost all".
Indeed, you're exactly correct. Thank you.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net