On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:34:18 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:42 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:10 +0000, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote:
> > package: uqm - 0.6.2-1.fc7.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386
> > unresolved deps:
> > libmikmod.so.2
>
> these packages need to be rebuilt because of the recent update of mikmod
> (increased libmikmod soname):
Updating mikmod (and to a beta, not even a full release!) after the
feature freeze seems like a bad idea. What's the compelling reason that
we shouldn't revert this change?
If it will be reverted, we should make sure no Extras rebuilds,
which have been done meanwhile, are pushed. One is in needsign
already.