On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 09:27 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:09 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 05 January 2007 10:01, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Personally, I'd rather see the current FESCo and Core cabal merged into
> > a single entity that shares both responsibilities. The Packaging
> > Committee would certainly still exist to come up with the packaging
> > guidelines, so that wouldn't change. And you immediately get community
> > involvement in the content of the release isos, which is what I think
> > Jessie meant by "hopefully there will be more than just me". Just
my
> > $0.02.
>
> Keep in mind that it's just adding more people to a committee who may not care
> about other things such as sponsorship stuff, policy related to packages,
> various other stuff that FESCO current has to vote on. Its adding more
> people, making quorum harder to reach, especially when they might not have
> any interest/knowledge of whats being voted on.
I said their responsibilities should be merged. I didn't say they
should necessarily be merged in in their current states.
Actually, re-reading my own email I really did say "the current FESCo
and Core cabal..". I meant the responsibilities though, not necessarily
the actual committees themselves. Sorry for the confusion.
josh