On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 14.07.10 13:16, Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > > 6. plymouth interactions
> >
> > There's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614245 which
> > currently is an issue when using plymouth in conjunction with
> > systemd. Ray promised to look into this every day now ;-)
>
> Plymouth is the default, so if you make systemd the default, almost
> everyone is going to be using plymouth in conjunction with systemd. If
> that's currently broken, I don't really think it makes sense to flip the
> switch on systemd.
Well, it's not as broken that your system won't boot up. All that
happens is that you will get a text bootup instead of a graphical
one. Not a big deal. But yes, this should be fixed. And it is probably
even very easy to fix it. But nothing that should stop us from flipping
the switch now.
Ah, OK, that seems alright then.
Did you see the post a while back from someone who tried systemd and
found it wouldn't boot their system? Just curious. I will try this
myself later today.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net