On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche(a)redhat.com> wrote:
sgallagh wrote:
>> Seriously? Retiring useful package? Isn't that a bit of
>> overkill? (Yes, I'm grumpy because I'm using Cherokee).
>
> This has been discussed ad nauseam.
>
> The reasoning was that upstream ships imagery that is in violation of
> Fedora's policy not to ship offensive material. [...]
Considering the inherently political and subjective nature of this,
could those policy terms be clarified so that "offensiveness" is
defined simply by fesco construal?
I doubt that this can be defined .. it has to be a case by case basis.
For instance we named a release "beefy miracle" and that might have
been offensive for some people (ex. in India)., but
apparently no one cared enough to "officially" complain.