On Dec 21, 2007 11:22 AM, King InuYasha <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007 11:11 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> King InuYasha wrote:
> > I would have to agree with Chris and Bryan regarding Anaconda and the
> > icon style. It seems that Anaconda has had more and more features tacked
> > on it since its inception so long ago. Has Anaconda ever been rewritten
> > or has anyone even considered rewriting Anaconda? The icon style issue
> > could be fixed once the Echo Icons are finished... if they do get
> > finished....
>
> Pretty much all software gets features tacked on over time. I didn't
> hear the review suggest anything close to a rewrite and a rewrite would
> be absolutely pointless anyway
>
>
>
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
>
> Echo would get finished faster if there was more contributors.
>
> Rahul
>
> Ps: Don't top post.
>
>
Well, my beef with Anaconda is similar to Chris and Bryan's as well as I
have noticed that Anaconda has been getting considerably slower each
release. And in Fedora 5, Anaconda made the jump from requiring at least
192MB of RAM for GUI to 256MB of RAM for GUI.
Frankly I think 256MB for GUI is fair. And yet, I think Anaconda
doesn't have NEARLY enough features -- it's too linear for my tastes.
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
(
www.pembo13.com )