On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 17:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 03. 20 17:07, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 09:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 24. 03. 20 13:22, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > Most probably we will revert this
> > > change in upstream 1.1.1 branch and I will update the rawhide
> > > build
> > > with the revert patch as well.
> >
> > Can this please happen rather sooner than later?
>
> I've built openssl-1.1.1e-2.fc33 with the EOF handling change
> reverted
> today.
>
>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1482948
Thanks a lot.
> > The list of (likely) affected packages is growing:
> >
> >
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/openssl-libs?epoch1=1&v...
> >
> > It shows that this does not only break Python's own test suite,
> > but
> > various
> > Python packages are failing as well (incl. python-pip).
> >
> > This blocks the testing rebuilds with Python 3.9.0a5 (reporting
> > way
> > too many
> > unrelated FTBFSes).
>
> Unless OpenSSL upstream decides otherwise we will however have this
> issue later in Fedora 33 development when the rebase to 3.0
> happens. Of
> course the rebase to 3.0 will be disruptive in more ways and so it
> should be done in a side-tag first.
Do you have at least a rough estimate for when should we expect this?
E.g. is it going to be after mid-May or before?
I have to say that the schedule of the OpenSSL 3.0 release is a little
bit conflicting with the F33 schedule. However I should be able to have
a rebase to a beta version of OpenSSL 3.0 prepared at the end of June.
Of course depending on the problems with the dependent package rebuilds
in the side-tag we will see if the 3.0 would be viable for the Fedora
33 at all.
--
Tomáš Mráz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
[You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your
conscience.]