Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > That was overly critical of me and did nothing to actually further the
> > discussion. I apologise.
> No need to apologize! It's just the truth: ARM is not ready to be a
> primary
Kevin, I disagree. A positive tone to discussion is important even when
speaking the truth.
There was no negative tone in Matthew Garrett's original message:
If the Fedora/ARM community don't care about feature parity with
x86,
then we should just drop them back to secondary status.
There was nothing impolite or insulting in there. It might be impopular with
the ARM people, but it's still a valid point that had to be made, and
shouldn't have been retracted.
The decision to make ARM primary was a mistake, period.
Kevin Kofler