Chris Ball (cjb(a)laptop.org) said:
>> If some some spin decided to make every user run as root,
ship
>> with no firewalling, have password-less accounts, or have
>> insecure services enabled by default, etc.
> You mean Sugar as configured on the XO? (It has passwordless
> user, who can su without a password.)
It's true, but note that the XO software is technically a "Remix"
rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements
on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree
with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.)
But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and
image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it
was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'.
Bill