Matthias Clasen wrote:
Out of interest, I didn't see any information about how we did in
terms of features that made it in vs features
that were dropped or deferred in your F8 recap. Did we drop anything, and if so, have you
looked at why ?
Thanks for all of your feedback. I will make sure FESCo considers it
when they discuss changes to the policy.
In terms of stats on features that were dropped or deferred--I did not
actively track them, but that is in interesting question. Would there
be value in doing that or is anecdotal evidence enough? I ask because
tracking it is all manual :)
In almost all of the cases, FESCo and the feature owner(s) agreed that a
particular feature wasn't ready enough and should be deferred a the time
approval was being voted on OR features with stale statuses that I
raised at FESCo after not hearing back from the feature owner when it
was pretty much known that that particular feature was not going to be
completed.
Then there were a couple of features where the feature was approved,
nothing happened with it and then it was dropped because the owner said
it wasn't really considered a feature...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/Bookmarks
John