Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) said:
> > I'm not quite sure why it needs separate lsb/upstart
init scripts
> > anyway. Don't most of our packages just include one initscript with both
> > bits in the headers?
>
> No. A package could have either a SystemV init script or an upstart job
> file. (Note that we don't recommend people push upstart job files for their
> services yet, but since when have people listened...)
oh, yeah, that's right. we have SysV scripts with the LSB stuff in the
headers. no need to depend on redhat-lsb for that, though, so far as I
can figure?
If you use lsb-defined headers, no.
If you use lsb-defined init script functions, yes.
Bill