Michael Catanzaro wrote:
P.S. On a completely unrelated note... and just brainstorming... so
long as our Flatpaks are built from RPMs, there's probably no great
technical reason to get rid of the RPMs, even if Flatpak becomes the
primary/default distribution mechanism. We mainly just need a way to
avoid confusion when reporting bugs, since the RPM and Flatpak versions
of applications could have different bugs.
The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be built
twice.
Kevin Kofler