On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 13:39 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Would an 8[1] month cycle cause fewer slips per release? Fewer bugs?
Personally, I'd like to see a 9-12 month cycle. Much as I'm sure
everyone out there instantly upgrades every system the moment a new
release comes out, and doesn't mind a year of overall updates, something
- just something - suggests to me that this might, not, quite be
true...I'd love it if we'd actually ask our users what they want.
Jon.