Re: [modularity] First round of Boltron feedback published
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:23:05AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
The issue I am seeing with this is that people who want to keep
existing
scripts are also wanting to keep existing package mechanism. If I say yum
install httpd I am expecting to get the RPMs and setup I have for N years.
I am not expecting to get a profile and modular set of tools decided by
someone else who came up with a name httpd which matches a different case
need. The same with WordPress or some other toolkit.
If the module WordPress pulls in maria-db and my site has been using
PostgreSQL, I am not just going to be confused.. I am going to be angry
because my other scripts to seed the database aren't working. The quick
Good examples, thanks.
Do you think that this problem is as bad if we overload / replace /
enhance comps groups and the @ syntax? Or do we need to find a
different character? (Uh, I guess % is sitting out there....)
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader