On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 20:53 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> To me it is, in a weird way: I tend to view the presence of someone
> who's willing to actually *do* something as a proxy for there being
> others who care about it. For instance on the 32-bit x86 topic - if the
> x86 SIG had *worked* and we'd had one or two people who really cared
> about it show up to do the work, like we have for ARM or ppc64, I'd
> have been more inclined to believe there were more people out there who
> really needed to run Fedora on 32-bit x86.
From my perspective, you are twisting reality. The 32-bit x86 sig never
had a chance, because it was clear to everybody involved, RHAT wanted to
kill it and because everybody @RH proactively worked against any attempt
to support it.
Um. So those times I found bugs specific to 32-bit x86 and mailed the
list about them, that was me proactively working against any attempt to
support it? That's funny, that's not how it felt at the time.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net