On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:26:21PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:05:23PM +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > At least we see where this is going.
> > If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
> > the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
> > of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
> How about reliable online updates of running applications as a
AND the ability to roll back, to choose beta or stable streams, etc.
For example, the Google Play app store, you can check a box to opt in
to beta versions of an app you're interested in following the bleeding
Sounds like it would be an excellent feature to add to rpm/dnf.
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org