On 02/18/2016 08:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
> It's an issue we see occasionally where the package thinks it knows
> better than the explicit CFLAGs being set, I'll get it sorted out.
But why are those intrinsics now requiring NEON at all? Those are GCC byte
swap intrinsics documented as being architecture-independent and should be
implemented in software (through shifts or rotates) when there is no native
byte swap instruction.
And is Fedora actually requiring NEON as the baseline on ARM? I thought it
was not.
We require an ARMv7A or newer and a VFP with enough registers to support
the hard ABI e.g. -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16
The message in the header error is only an example.
Cheers,
Carlos.