On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:48 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:26 -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
> I think a much better solution would be to require similar critical path
> policies, across *all* releases, not just pending ones, while still
> allowing non-critpath packages to go directly to stable.
That is an acceptable fallback. But just for the record, I consider the
critical path on my desktop to include not just kernel/udev/modules/etc.
but also GNOME, cups, and other things I use each day. I don't
personally care if KDE is updated 20 times a week, or about other
packages that aren't installed by default being rebased often.
The current critical path does include most of that. You can see the
current critpath list at:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100309/logs/critpath.txt
It's generated daily, it's not a static list. It does currently include
most of the important bits of GNOME, and cups-libs.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net