On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but
> > here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these
> > functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update
> > going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does
> > anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11?
> >
>
> the suggestion I had made at fudcon went something like this:
>
> 1. all packages being put in as updates would need to be marked as per
> the type of update. the default is 'trivial'. Options might include: new
> pkg, trivial, feature, bugfix, security
>
> 2. We would issue security updates whenever they happened. Issue bugfix
> updates once every 2 weeks. Everything else once a month.
How about we keep updates and updates-testing more like they are and add
another repo like updates-stable that follows your policy and is the
only updates repo enabled by default.
That sounds good.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium